<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PRINCE EVANS SOLICITORS LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A ‘change of mind’ is not an option</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/a-change-of-mind-is-not-an-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/a-change-of-mind-is-not-an-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auctioneers law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property auctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the gavel falls, the parties have exchanged contracts. In other words, the successful bidder has automatically entered into a binding contract for the purchase of the property from the seller (the auctioneer is authorised to complete the paperwork (Memorandum of Sale) on behalf of the seller. Properties are not sold ‘subject to contract’, ‘subject [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/a-change-of-mind-is-not-an-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Seminar: Evidence in Possession Claims: “The Readiness is All!”</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/free-seminar-evidence-in-possession-claims-the-readiness-is-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/free-seminar-evidence-in-possession-claims-the-readiness-is-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Maltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint tenancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[possession claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Landlords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: 26th June 2013 Venue: The British Library, St Pancras, London Time: 3:30pm registration Partners Anthony Best and Jeremy Teall, together with solicitors Sharon Porter-Gayle and Aisha Akhtar of Prince Evans Solicitors will share their knowledge and experience on preparing evidence in possession claims and practical issues when a tenant terminates a joint tenancy. When [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/free-seminar-evidence-in-possession-claims-the-readiness-is-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cohabiting couples – the law remains unfair</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/cohabiting-couples-the-law-remains-unfair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/cohabiting-couples-the-law-remains-unfair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Evans Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The large number of people choosing to cohabit without getting married, has led to a rise in complex and quite often costly legal disputes between unmarried couples following separation in the absence of a Cohabitation Agreement. The legal rights of cohabiting couples comes to the forefront once again with the case of Pamela Curran –v- [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/cohabiting-couples-the-law-remains-unfair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does a landlord have a right of entry to commercial premises to carry out repairs, where a tenant in breach has failed to do so?</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/does-a-landlord-have-a-right-of-entry-to-commercial-premises-to-carry-out-repairs-where-a-tenant-in-breach-has-failed-to-do-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/does-a-landlord-have-a-right-of-entry-to-commercial-premises-to-carry-out-repairs-where-a-tenant-in-breach-has-failed-to-do-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial Premises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer is surely a simple one! Unfortunately not; this area of law is uncertain. The first point to make is that faced with uncertainty, it is extremely important for a landlord to reserve such a right of entry in the written lease. If no such right is reserved and the landlord or its workman [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/does-a-landlord-have-a-right-of-entry-to-commercial-premises-to-carry-out-repairs-where-a-tenant-in-breach-has-failed-to-do-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inheritance Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/inheritance-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/inheritance-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inheritance Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Inheritance Tax? Benjamin Franklin once wrote that there are only two certainties in life namely &#8216;death and taxes&#8217;. It can therefore be agued that all forms of death tax are the fiscal synthesise of these two unavoidable &#8216;certainties&#8217; that we all face at some point in time. The first death tax, Legacy Duty, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/inheritance-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince Evans Takes &#8220;Spouse&#8221; Succession Claim To Court Of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/prince-evans-takes-spouse-succession-claim-to-court-of-appeal-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/prince-evans-takes-spouse-succession-claim-to-court-of-appeal-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince Evans Solicitors LLP has successfully obtained permission for the Court of Appeal to consider the definition of “spouse” under the Rent Act 1977 potentially entitling a widow to succeed to her late husband’s tenancy. Prince Evans is representing a private tenant married under Moroccan law who is claiming to succeed to a Rent Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/prince-evans-takes-spouse-succession-claim-to-court-of-appeal-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partner, Elaine Allen, Of Prince Evans Solicitors LLP &#8211; Lawyer Of The Year!</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/partner-elaine-allen-of-prince-evans-solicitors-llp-lawyer-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/partner-elaine-allen-of-prince-evans-solicitors-llp-lawyer-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elaine Allen was named Lawyer of the Year (2013) at the 7th annual Women in Construction Awards on 27 February 2013. All of us here at Prince Evans are proud of Elaine’s fabulous achievement. This year’s recognition is well earned. Elaine is Partner and Head of Social Housing Development with Prince Evans. Elaine has over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/partner-elaine-allen-of-prince-evans-solicitors-llp-lawyer-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welfare Reform Update</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/welfare-reform-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/welfare-reform-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 5th February 2013 the Government responded to a report by the Work and Pensions committee on Universal credit. The Government has issued a command paper; “Universal Credit implementation; meeting the needs of vulnerable Claimants.” The following points are highlighted from the paper: Direct payment of universal credit to landlords; where Claimants fall into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/welfare-reform-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petrodell -v- Prest: Appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court in March 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/petrodell-v-prest-appeal-to-be-heard-by-the-supreme-court-in-march-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/petrodell-v-prest-appeal-to-be-heard-by-the-supreme-court-in-march-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrodell -v- Prest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Evans Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal, comprising of Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, gave permission recently to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Ltd –v- Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. Many of you will have read my previous ‘blog’ about the Court of Appeal decision in this case. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/petrodell-v-prest-appeal-to-be-heard-by-the-supreme-court-in-march-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Court sentences a property tycoon to 6 years imprisonment</title>
		<link>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/family-court-sentences-a-property-tycoon-to-6-years-imprisonment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/family-court-sentences-a-property-tycoon-to-6-years-imprisonment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lheasman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprisonment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tycoon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court ruled yesterday (16th January 2013) that a property tycoon should be sentenced to 6 months in prison for consistently failing to comply with court orders. The decision came after many years of protracted court proceedings and dispute over maintenance payments to Ms Young. They have two young children together. The parties separated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prince-evans.co.uk/family-court-sentences-a-property-tycoon-to-6-years-imprisonment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
